Herr Hübner, but at least part of the experts may also react to your new theory of the soul and the cosmic worlds, as well as the new main states of consciousness with scepticism at least, because for most of them your statements substantiate a whole new conception of the world a complete new understanding of nature and creation.
The modern physicists, who are searching desperately for a world formula, may react heatedly to your view of things.
Not to talk about the religious scholars and philosophers as these are essentially bound by their churches.
Thus, I would almost assume that your “theory of the soul” as I would like to call it,
will sooner find approval among doctors and psychologists.
But especially the confirmed natural scientists and among those especially the ones which have so overbearingly devoted themselves for such a long time to the material world: the physicists , may be really stuck here with their conception of the world or am I mistaken?
First of all, we are concerned with natural science and scientific findings
But what is called natural science nowadays is defined too narrowly.
But it is not forbidden to expand the scientific view
and/or to extend the scientists’ horizon.
You must remember that almost all scientists only know the first three mains states of consciousness
With these they want to understand nature, and they even imagine they are able to understand nature.
But in the context of the first three main states of consciousness the relative limited waking state of consciousness
, the relative limited dream consciousness
and the infinite limited deep sleep
you cannot grasp what “nature” really means.
According to its character, nature is a cosmic phenomenon even a universal one. Hardly any scientist, limited in his thinking, will dare to contradict this in public.